<![CDATA[DR ABI PERRIN

<![CDATA[DR ABI PERRIN - Blog]]>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:35:08 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[The Power of Personal Stories]]>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:03:18 GMThttp://abiperrin.com/blog/the-power-of-personal-storieshow and why we wrote a climate book

A personal story feels like the only appropriate form for this post. This is the story of how I came to realise that it wasn’t just facts and evidence that were missing from our culture’s conversations about Climate and Nature… and of how coordinating and co-authoring the book Scientists on Survival: Personal Stories of Climate Action crystallised for me why the personal account has a remarkable power as part of those conversations.

For a long time I sincerely believed that showing the right science or the right evidence to the right people would inevitably lead to a cascade of events that would bring about the transformations that our species and societies desperately need. The story I told myself was as follows. Equipped with the science, politicians would legislate to reduce the harm that humans have, mostly unwittingly, been causing, they’d throw support behind better, fairer, resilient and sustainable alternatives to the harmful systems of our age, they’d create an adaptation plan to help us cope with the consequences of the climate and ecological disruption that we can no longer prevent. Knowing the risks the climate and ecological breakdown pose to their own businesses - let alone the future of humanity - corporations would make a rapid pivot away from extraction and destruction and towards regeneration. Fuelled by knowledge, public consciousness and priorities would shift. We’d demand that ‘leaders’ act with proportionate urgency, and enable us all to meet our basic needs whilst treading more lightly on the Earth we depend on for our survival. But, gradually, I’ve found myself forced to reexamine this simplistic ideal that was motivating my work in science (be that via engaging with research, communication, education or policy). Whilst maintaining that it is fundamentally important that we are well-informed, the combination of disinterested, dismissive and disempowered responses to evidence I’d brought to different spaces over the years has made it clear to me that knowledge alone is not enough. For each of us to take on our respective role in the tale I had been telling myself we’d also need an emotional connection to that knowledge - we’d need to feel the myriad ways it really, really matters to us.* We’d also need to believe that it is possible for our personal actions to make a difference.

Just over a year ago, a group of activist scientists were approached by a publisher, who invited them to write a book about the science of the Climate & Ecological Emergency. But the book that actually got written is not that book.** It’s not a ‘science’ book. Instead it’s a collection of personal accounts from scientists who’ve decided they need to do more than publish facts to play their part in protecting life. When I heard the call for scientists to get involved, I was ready and willing to get stuck in… and it turned out to be a huge privilege to get to coordinate the project alongside the excellent Drs Caroline Vincent and Viola Ross-Smith, and to write it in collaboration with 21 other inspiring scientists, similarly motivated by our love for the world around us.

Scientists tend to feel relatively comfortable talking in data, statistics, probabilities, hypotheses and theorems … but what we’re rarely expected or trained to do is to communicate the emotional as well as the ‘rational’ responses we have when faced with information and its implications. I often wonder whether this has contributed to pervasive complacency about unfolding Emergency - by calmly analysing and documenting the breakdown of the Earth’s life-enabling systems rather than allowing ourselves to feel and show a commensurate level of fear, have scientists sent mixed signals about the scale and urgency of the crisis? It’s something I’ve actively tried to “unlearn” over the past few years: in most circumstances I have to consciously decide not to say something like “the E.U. Copernicus Climate Change Service data puts the average surface temperature of the Earth in 2024 at approximately 1.6°C above an estimate of the 1850-1900 temperature designated to be the pre-industrial level”, because what most people really need to know is that humans have heated the world beyond the point that scientists agree is safe for any of us. We can communicate clearly and urgently without compromising the integrity and accuracy of the scientific information, and I’ve come to believe that we scientists would be much more effective advocates for informed, positive change if we gave ourselves more permission to share how that information impacts us and what action it compels. Might we be in a better position now if decades ago many more scientists hadn’t stopped after “The Earth is heating rapidly” and instead went on to explain “This terrifies me and I am going to do everything in my power to stop us burning fossil fuels”?

For Scientists on Survival: Personal Stories of Climate Action we encouraged and supported one another to speak from the heart rather than be constrained by a sense that scientists ought somehow to be detached, ‘neutral’ or dispassionate observers of a world in crisis. The process of writing our personal stories - whether about our journeys in science, transitions we have made, or protests actions we’ve taken - was different for every author. Some chapters published today are virtually unchanged since they were first submitted to us, whilst others are radically different. For me the most rewarding part of the whole project has been working with the authors to craft their stories into a clear, engaging and compelling narrative without detracting from each scientist's unique personality, humanity and voice (nor, of course, from the accuracy of any science they were communicating along the way). It has felt like such a privilege to get to know the humans behind those stories through doing this. Having spent years exploring how to communicate in ways that cultivate Emergency understanding and action, it’s also heartening to have tangibly supported people I find so inspiring to do the same.

As I write this on the book’s official publication date, I feel a rare sense of pride having contributed to showing the humans behind the protests and the headlines in this way. Amidst the stories told by those 24 people, there will be something liable to strike a chord with any of us trying to navigate life on this imperilled blue dot, whether we consider ourself to be a scientist, activist, both or neither. That makes me hopeful that our book can encourage and provoke its readers to envisage and embark upon a pathway to taking part in effective action (in whatever form makes the most sense for them). Watering those seeds of hope are incoming reactions from friends and family and activist acquaintances who got hold of some of the first copies. Unexpected people have expressed admiration for the courage and passion the scientist authors have demonstrated. They’ve shared a range of emotions, thoughts and questions evoked by these stories. They’ve told me they feel moved and motivated to take - or at least investigate - various forms of action themselves.

*See my previous post “The Understanding Gap” for more thoughts on how both knowing and feeling are vital precursors for informed and effective action.
** The story of how that happened, in the words of its co-author and co-coordinator Dr Caroline Vincent, is here

More information about Scientists on Survival: Personal Stories of Climate Action

As described by the publisher: "In this important and timely book, scientists from a broad range of disciplines detail their personal responses to climate change and the ecological crises that led them to form Scientists for XR and work tirelessly within it. Whether their inspiration comes from education or activism, family ties or the work environment, the scientists writing here record what drives them, what non-violent direct action looks like to them, what led them to become interested in the environmental crisis that threatens us all and what they see as the future of life on Earth.”

If you’d like to read our book it’s now available in bookshops and online book retailers. We recommend Bookshop.org which supports independent retailers). If the cost is a barrier to you please use my contact form to request a copy (I have access to a limited supply).
You can find endorsements from Zadie Smith, Caroline Lucas, Robin Ince, Sir David King, Prof Kevin Anderson and more here, and there are some early reviews already out from Brian McHugh and Tom Hardy in The Ecologist.
A public launch event for Scientists on Survival is being hosted in York on Earth Day, Tuesday 22nd April. You can reserve a place via this event page.

]]><![CDATA[The Understanding Gap]]>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:51:53 GMThttp://abiperrin.com/blog/the-understanding-gapRecently I have ended up thinking a lot about the “theory of change” that’s guiding where I channel my attention and energy at this fraught time in the world. Essentially, why do I do the work that I do now? Why do I think that is so important to be communicating the science and context of the climate and ecological emergency? This post is an attempt to formalise and express my answers to those questions.

When trying to solve a problem, it helps to understand it: it usually helps a lot. If we try to act on a problem we don’t understand enough, not only do we increase our chances of failure, we run the risk of making the problem much, much worse. We don’t always need to understand a problem entirely to be able to have a positive impact on it, but a grounding in the system we are dealing with is arguably essential when life is at stake. It’s why medics usually spend years learning about the human body before they’re allowed to prescribe treatments.

I’d wager most of us have a better scientific understanding of the human body’s systems and what can go wrong with them than we have for the Earth’s systems and the existential threats posed by their imbalance. Alongside everything we learn more passively throughout our lives, we are likely to have been encouraged, or even required, to learn about the former. I had lessons about every human organ at school, I had to take entire exams about the inner workings of the body… but about the climate? The only vaguely relevant thing I can recall was a video tape we were played in a Geography class about how we needed to sort out our energy system... because we were probably going to run out of coal in a few decades*.

If you’re going through school these days you probably do learn a bit more than I did about climate and nature in the 2000s, but most adults - including those leading business and government right now - have probably never been expected to. Most of us haven’t had much opportunity to engage with it, and many of us won’t have felt much need to. This has contributed to a massive gulf between how much we actually understand about the predicament we are in and how much we need to understand to empower us to take effective actions in response. And given that we now need all hands on deck to respond as the Climate and Nature Emergency escalates, it’s a bit like we’re trying to run a hospital without having trained the medical staff.

This is how I see the route from a default position of uncertainty and inaction to the position we need as many people as possible to be in: taking informed and effective climate action. Cultivating understanding is the essential first step, but is not the only important factor. Of course, the reality is more complicated than this, and no two people will have identical journeys - this is simply my attempt distill the theory of change that motivates my own action in trying to address the “understanding gap”

This ‘understanding gap’ is the main reason I now focus my energies on Climate and Nature communication and training, starting with the foundations. And what I see as those foundations aren’t just ‘the science’, but also our more emotional connection to that scientific knowledge. To be able to make an informed choice about what to do in our job roles or personal lives, not very many of us need to know the precise concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the temperature of the ocean, the rate of species extinctions… but we all do need a sense of how urgent our situation is, how fast it’s changing, and how connected the different components of the Emergency are. To be motivated to do the inevitably difficult work of creating a fairer, greener, more liveable future than one we are currently hurtling towards, we also need to feel how much it really matters that we do. And to be effective in those actions, we need the confidence that we know the systems we are working within well enough to see where we can each make a meaningful difference. Embedding all of those things - that holistic knowing and feeling - into Climate & Nature communication or training is no small task. But for most audiences, it wouldn’t be fair to assume that either of those core elements of understanding are already there.

In a world where we need to mount a rapid emergency response, it can be really tempting to leap towards action without having properly addressed the understanding gap. Our situation can (understandably!) feel too urgent to spend time on learning and thinking like this… but I would argue that it’s too urgent not to cultivate understanding before expecting - or even allowing - ourselves to participate in potentially life-saving interventions.

*at the time I was actually very worried about the prospect of us running out of coal!

A note on another gap… the one between understanding and action. I am in no way underestimating the significance of this gap and am acutely aware of how frustrating it can be to drive change even once you feel sufficiently informed and motivated to do so. There is so much we need to do, and it’s precisely because of this that we need as many people as possible to understand the problems we face - not just so that we can each take effective action in the areas we are best equipped to, but also to create a broader environment that enables that action, where we don’t find our paths blocked by others who haven’t had the opportunity to understand why those actions are so essential. I’m often asked to write training sessions that address both of these gaps, essentially taking people from not-knowing-and-not-acting to being fully activated, able to immediately set themselves specific, actionable, meaningful goals (often with an extremely short time set aside to do so). I wish I had the power to do this but rather than claiming that’s possible without there being other equally important inputs (good support being absolutely key), I am committed to making sure I can address the understanding gap in the most engaging, empowering and motivating ways I can.

]]><![CDATA[2024: A new chapter]]>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:32:34 GMThttp://abiperrin.com/blog/2024-a-new-chapter-of-science-action2024 has been a year has been the start of a new way of working for this scientist.

Transitions & New Experiments

By the end of 2023, I knew the time had come to close the academic research chapter of my working life. For many years I had genuinely believed that generating knowledge was the best way I could contribute positively to a sustainable future…but over time I’ve realised it’s not a lack of available knowledge that’s blocking that path; broadly we already have the essential scientific information - what we urgently need is for those essentials to be widely known and acted upon.

So, whilst wrapping up my research work (planting some seeds for change along the way), I set myself up as a freelance scientist open to any and all forms of climate and nature communication. By early February, my first ‘bookings’ were trickling in. My first was to run an interactive introduction to climate and nature science as part of a training day for Yorkshire’s NHS clinical psychologists. Subsequent highlights have included a keynote speech for environmental masters’ program graduates, workshops for various faith organisations, speaking as a panellist at several environmental documentary film screenings, and facilitating a discussion with an author and TV presenter about their recent book.

On the very same day as my first freelance ‘gig’ I started a part-time position with the renewables team at York Community Energy. My job involves working with local organisations such as libraries, sports centres and health centres to determine whether they’d be suitable locations for community-owned renewable energy infrastructure. Over the next year or so we’re looking to install a number of solar panel arrays and use the income from the energy we supply to support people in York who are most disadvantaged by our energy system through measures such as energy advice, home insulation and debt reduction (all whilst also contributing to the decarbonisation of our city’s energy supply). My Fridays are now spent with the rest of the team creating models, refining plans, reporting and communicating our insights from our small office, else we’re out cycling to visit our sites around York, often catching some impressive views from the rooftops.

I was delighted to accept a new opportunity last Spring, a contractor role as a researcher and writer for AimHi Earth. For a time a few years back when I was learning everything I could about the climate and nature crisis, I took part in multiple sustainability training programmes and AimHi Earth’s stood out as by far the most holistic, engaging and motivating; it was a communication approach I was excited by at the time and am even more enthusiastic about now I’m involved with updating, refining, expanding and tailoring their training materials. Since joining the team, my role and responsibilities within it have grown significantly, my main focus now being a comprehensive refresh of the core training content that will be used to activate millions of nature-first thinkers around the world.

Perhaps the most surprising project I’ve been involved with this year has been the creation of a non-fiction book: a collection of short personal essays from scientists who have become activists. Alongside writing my own story and the book’s introduction, I’ve been part of its coordinating team and have had the privilege of working with other chapter authors to tell their unique stories in compelling, and sometimes emotionally vulnerable, ways (something that often doesn't come naturally to us scientists). The writing is now complete and Scientists on Survival: Personal Stories of Climate Action is due for publication in March.

Alongside this evolving portfolio of roles and projects, I’ve continued to channel energy into our flourishing local environmental network YorkCliConnect, created and shared a range of resources, and supported various campaigns and change-making organisations. It’s been a particularly big year of action for Nature restoration, clean water and the Climate and Nature bill, as well as for challenging practices in the fossil fuel, biomass and insurance industries that are exacerbating the threats to life on Earth.

Feelings & Learnings

Leaving the lab behind came with some feelings of sadness and loss, and it was nerve-wracking to take a leap to a very different way of working… but thanks to the incredibly heartening support I have had and to the people and organisations who’ve chosen to work with me, it’s been an overwhelmingly positive and rewarding transition. In the work I do now I’m finding it much easier to see impact and progress within a more tangible timeframe. I’m being invited into spaces where there’s an appetite for change and I have the chance to help it grow. I feel valued and trusted by the teams I now work within, as well as by the people I interact with more transiently in the course of my freelance work. Some adjustments have been more difficult: adapting to a lot of remote work and a lack of routine hasn’t been seamless, and perhaps because my work feels more impactful and purpose-driven, it’s been harder to find balance. But with experience and the guidance of the community around me, I’m (gradually!) learning to recognise and avoid patterns of overwork and exhaustion.

Alongside learning to work in different ways, my experiences in 2024 have really helped me develop confidence and competence as a writer, speaker and freelancer. In particular, the process of tailoring approaches and messages to better engage specific audiences has become more intuitive, and I’ve also come to appreciate the surprising power of the personal story (I intend to write more about this!). More than ever before, I’ve seen the enabling and supportive strengths of community; my friends, partner and activist family provided me so much encouragement as well as practical support to make this transition, and an even bigger network has made that transition a success. To name just a few of those contributors specifically, I’m hugely grateful to: Matthew, George and the wider team at AimHi Earth; my community energy colleagues Rich and Kirsten; fellow book coordinators Caroline and Viola and all the other scientists who have contributed to this project and the wider movement; everyone involved in environmental campaigning and activism - it’s been a particularly tough year but there’s been a lot to be proud of; last but not least Caroline, Sophia, Zoe, Curly and Dom whose care and wisdom has meant more than I can articulate.

Going forwards

Much of the work I started this year will continue into 2025, but in order to work more sustainably and impactfully I’m making a commitment here to refine what I focus on. Previously I’d intended to reach as many people as possible but now I’ll aim to prioritise bringing the most essential climate and nature science to those with the most power – and therefore responsibility – to accelerate necessary system change. In practice this means a shift in my community-based roles to focus less on delivering training, instead supporting others to gain confidence in doing so. It also means spending more time and energy engaging groups I’m currently less familiar with or comfortable within, specifically in corporate and political spaces.

I’m looking forward to sharing our book, to seeing the impact of our new and refreshed training course, and overall to helping nurture understanding of climate and nature science in ways that grow our collective ability to act and adapt in a rapidly changing world.

]]><![CDATA[Always a scientist]]>Mon, 30 Dec 2024 23:16:03 GMThttp://abiperrin.com/blog/always-a-scientistPersonal reflections at the end of a 15 year chapter in academic research science.

‘Scientist’ is usually the first word I use to describe myself, and that's probably because throughout my adulthood ‘scientist’ has been not only my job but something of an identity. Hence my exit from academic research this year has felt like a massive transition personally as well as professionally. But as much of a wrench as it has been to leave the lab bench behind me, the data, the evidence, my head and my heart are aligned on this one: in an era that will be defined by how we respond to compounding existential threats, it’s time to find a new way of being a scientist.

ONCE A SCIENTIST...

Scientific research can be such an incredible job to get to do. You’re tasked with observing, investigating and documenting a slice of the as-yet-unknown. You could well be the first – or even the only – person to witness or understand something amazing about the fabric of our world. It was surprisingly easy to lose that sense of wonder whilst immersed in competitive pursuit of the data, publications, funding and accolades that make it possible to keep climbing the career ladder in academia. But now, outside of that environment, I’m grateful to be able to look back with fondness on the tens of thousands of hours I spent planning experiments, tending to colourful flasks of assorted microbes, peering down increasingly fancy microscopes, developing those dreaded Western blots, then processing, analysing and sharing the insights this all generated. I’d really thought that my life in science would stay something like this until a comfortable retirement sometime in the 2060s. But about half a century ahead of schedule, its course started to look very different.

As a researcher studying malaria parasites and later similar types of environmentally-important ocean microbes, I’d felt motivated by the idea that we were making a meaningful contribution to improving lives and preventing suffering. But, catalysed by growing public concern about climate change in 2018, I’d found myself conflicted about the narrative that my research career was a noble pursuit, or something that would ultimately benefit humanity. I’d started to ‘zoom out’ and see the wider context I was working within: one where thousands of scientists had clearly identified imminent, existential threats; one where transforming our societies is the only way to prevent their collapse… but where we’re still struggling to translate knowledge into the action needed to protect life on Earth.

Despite wide acknowledgement of the climate and ecological emergency, and despite rhetoric around environmental sustainability, very little about the culture and daily experience of working in research science was changing around me. It was an uncomfortable paradox that I felt badly equipped to navigate - the new ‘normal’ was, on the surface of it, to accept that we’re facing crises that will profoundly change our lives… whilst simultaneously continuing with our work pretty much unchanged by that knowledge (though perhaps paying a bit more attention to plastic recycling). I found this confusing, especially amongst the research community, who I’d assumed to be in a prime position to understand and respond to what the science was telling us. In their article “No research on a dead planet” my friend Dr Aaron Thierry and co-authors explore why this ‘double reality’ currently prevails: none of us are immune to powerful psychological incentives to minimise or suppress our knowledge and feelings about frightening information, but – vitally – we each do have agency and opportunity to overcome these barriers and start to play a role in creating necessary, transformative change in our systems, institutions and societies.

For me it was feelings of fear, despair and isolation – not of duty nor agency – that first led me to find community as part of environmental social movements. I was especially drawn to spaces where scientists were organising, and all I’ve learned there has evolved my perception of what a scientist’s role could or should be in the 21st century (summarised here and potentially the subject of a future blog post). It empowered me to be braver, to explore how a scientist can make a positive impact within and beyond their job. So, alongside making various transitions in my lifestyle and research direction, I began, initially tentatively, to talk much more openly about the disruption of Earth’s life-supporting systems, my fears and feelings about what that meant for us, and my experiences of taking action in response. At work I attempted to start conversations about how academics might support and accelerate positive transformations, to activate people in leadership positions, to push for accessible and impactful environmental education and to build networks. Beyond the lab, I found many other avenues where a science background together with experience in advocacy and activism could be usefully combined; from facilitating workshops in my local community to amplifying scientists’ warnings through campaigning and direct action.

... Always a scientist?

Overall I’ve been very fortunate to have had a positive experience in moving from knowing about to acting upon the climate and ecological emergency. The reactions of colleagues, friends, family and the wider public along the way have largely been encouraging and motivating, though there have been challenging complexities, tensions and occasional hostility. Amongst the more painful have been in recognising and attempting to counter the inertia that persists within academia – a home I had, maybe naively, thought I’d be effectively-placed to help activate from within. Like many scientists I’ve had the pleasure of interacting with (including the authors of these calls-to-action), I still believe in the potential of the scientific research community, and of universities in particular, to foster and adapt to rapid change in our environment and societies. However, my own attempts to cultivate engagement and action have felt much less constrained – and ultimately more effective – where I’ve been working outside of any academic role, instead acting as a scientist in wider society.

The work I now prioritise focuses on exactly that; bringing the most essential science out of academic silos and into the places it needs to be understood and acted upon. In 2024, those included public and community spaces, local and national government, and, via an innovative educational start-up, some of the world’s biggest corporations. I don’t feel any less a ‘scientist’ having made a leap out of the research spaces that had become comfortably familiar. I’m still discovering, learning, experimenting, analysing and communicating, only now I use different methods in different environments to better align my actions with addressing broader, more urgent questions and challenges. I miss the lab, the students, the microbes and the associated moments of awe that were part of my life as a more traditional academic scientist, but I’m excited by the opportunities and impact that are already part of this new chapter.

]]><![CDATA[explain the climate & ecological emergency … in 10 minutes ?]]>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:12:44 GMThttp://abiperrin.com/blog/explain-the-climate-ecological-emergency-in-10-minutesI’m often asked to give an overview of the science of the climate and nature emergency in something like ten minutes…. and this is no small task. How can we capture the interconnected threats to life on Earth, conveying the vast scale and the urgent, urgent need for transformative action? How can we do that for audiences that we don’t know much about, who may not have had the opportunity to think very seriously about these difficult subjects before? How can we do that in a way that tells the whole truth but doesn’t throw those who hear it into a state of overwhelm, denial, or despair… but instead empowers and motivates? Is it possible to do this in ten minutes???

It feels important to try, and to find out! So I’ve challenged myself to sit down for just one hour and write down what I think are the absolute core things - without getting distracted by the details however important they are/feel - that any person needs to know to start on their own journey from knowing to acting. It won’t be polished, it won't be perfect - but it can form the basis of something that can be tested and refined. It’s what I know and communicate all the time, so I should have the really core message at my fingertips, right? It feels daunting nonetheless, but here goes….

Our Climate & Nature Emergency: the bare essentials

If there were just a few key things I wish as many people as possible would know, but also feel about the climate and ecological emergency… they would be something like these:

The threats are massive and widely underestimated.
Humans face escalating fires, floods, food shortages and consequent health and societal crises.

It’s happening NOW,
having a devastating impact on millions of people and countless other species around the world already.

The impacts will get worse,
and are likely to do so very rapidly. Every person and every species will experience those impacts.

This is extremely unfair
globally, socially and intergenerationally.

Current actions are nowhere near enough.
We need to transform our mindsets and systems if we are to secure a liveable future for ourselves, for future generations and for other species.

We can make a difference
but only if we act now and act together.

Here is a brief summary of what I mean by each of these…

The threats are massive, and widely underestimated

We know the Earth is heating up, and it’s heating faster than it has done since the human species evolved. Science is clear that this is a direct result of greenhouse gas emissions, caused predominantly by human activities such as burning fuels, agriculture and chemical use.
In parallel the ecosystems that regulate our climate and that we are dependent on for essential food and resources, continue to be destroyed. Humans have radically changed the land - clearing forest, degrading soils, polluting the water air and beyond. Species are going extinct over a thousand times faster than would be expected otherwise.
These effects combine to threaten the existence of every species on Earth, for example through heatwaves, fires, floods, storms, food scarcity, displacement and conflict.
It can be easy to feel like these threats aren’t as bad as they are, especially when we don’t see many leaders, or even the scientists studying these threats, acting proportionate to their own warnings.

It’s happening now.

Since humans began shaping the land on a global scale, we have been destroying irreplaceable ecosystems and disrupting the finely balanced functioning of the wider Earth system.
We have already seen direct impacts such as the loss of wild places and species, and there being hotter and less stable climate, and we are now seeing the knock-on effects on humans.
There are so many examples that it’s hard to find the ‘right’ record shattering heatwave, raging wildfire, or heartbreaking famine or conflict to highlight. As I write this I’m hearing about the deadly flooding in Valencia, Spain after ‘almost a year’s worth’ of rain fell in a single day.

The impacts will get worse

The worst effects of the harm already caused are yet to be seen; they take time to unfold… there is a delay between the cause and the full impact. Just one example I think about often is that, even with immediate radical climate action, entire island nations and major population centres will still likely be submerged due to sea level rise by the end of the century. Low-lying coastal cities - London, Los Angeles, Rio and many more - may not remain defendable in my own lifetime.
The essential systems that we need to survive on this planet are so incredibly interdependent. Disruption to one part of one of those systems has cascading impacts over time - imagine the cascading impacts on a food web if the organism at the base of it is wiped out.
Worse, we know that nonlinear phenomena involving feedback loops and tipping points can massively accelerate warming and the breakdown of ecosystems. We know we are perilously close to triggering major irreversible changes of state in our Earth system… but we do not know exactly how close…or if we have already done so.

This is extremely unfair

The people most responsible for causing and exacerbating these threats are very different to those who are most immediately and most badly impacted by them.
This injustice compounds existing global and social inequalities, for example between countries, wealth levels and generations.
A small number of people and organisations have personally profited from knowingly making this predicament worse and/or spreading misinformation to delay action to address it. Despite the now widely accepted science about the climate and ecological emergency, this continues in constantly evolving forms.

Current actions are nowhere near enough.

This section could easily turn into somewhere between a rant and a scream so I’ll keep it extremely brief: despite talk and advertising suggesting otherwise, it’s hard to think of any examples of governments or major corporations that are acting in line with what science is clear is necessary, or even their own (usually also inadequate) pledges.
Our conversations need to transform from action being about doing incrementally-less-harm-than-we-used-to (e.g. slightly reducing the deforestation/emissions/exploitation we cause year by year) to actively making things better (i.e. regenerating and restoring)

We can make a difference

There are some frightening changes that are now essentially locked-in… but we, collectively, have a choice about how bad, how rapid and how unfair we allow what happens next to be.
What can we do? In a nutshell:
- End the extraction, destruction and pollution we have become so accustomed to.
- Repair, restore and regenerate the natural systems that enable and support life to thrive.
- Communicate and collaborate to empower and accelerate action.
Individualised action has an importance, but we are so much more powerful when we act together. By influencing the systems, structures and cultures we operate within, we make it easier for one another to take more effective action.
We often underestimate others’ level of care and willingness to act - it’s hard to be the ‘first’ to speak up or try something different, it can also feel scary to get behind that first person when they do (even if you’re fully with them in spirit)... but when we are brave enough to show our willingness and our courage we build momentum, we build movements, we build hope and we create change.

So those were the words that flowed onto a blank page when I gave myself an hour to get them out. I gave myself an hour… I took almost two. But I know if I hadn’t set that intention I would otherwise have obsessed over referencing and phrasing and would have been less likely to home in on the absolute essentials. I intend to look at this with fresh eyes, perhaps add some visuals (and maaaaybe even a reference or six) to make it more engaging and useful to anyone who reads it.

]]>